THE MARYLAND PATRONAGE 17
correspondence wherein Lord Baltimore's effort to restore the
former table was cut short by passage of a, to him, still more
This act, in March, 1725/6, proposed to reduce again, by about
a fourth, the fees of the Commissary General, Deputy Secretary,
Examiner General, Clerk of the Council, Clerk of the High Court
of Appeals, and county clerks. His Lordship promptly disallowed
it, so that fees now went unregulated for two decades. Fee bills,
though often introduced, were never passed, for the Lower House
insisted on their table of 1725/6, and the Upper House as stub-
bornly on that of 1719. Baltimore's fee proclamation of 1733
merely served to heighten and turn against himself the mounting
wrath of the delegates.
Meanwhile the decayed state of Maryland's tobacco trade,
sinking ever lower since the Virginia law of 1730, compelled
the attention of legislators, producing at last, in July, 1747, an
inspection act modeled on that of Maryland's southern neighbor.
Moreover its preparation had created enough good will to settle
also the vexed fee question.
Both houses rightly apprehended that an inspection law would
raise tobacco prices twenty-five percent or more, so that tobacco
fees could be reduced without affecting the real value of officers'
incomes. Accordingly all fees and salaries were fixed at a fifth
or a fourth below the rates of 1719. To encourage production of
flax and hemp persons making no tobacco were allowed to pay
their fees in money at £ 0. 12. 6 currency per hundred pounds.
This law was a partial victory for the Upper House. It estab-
lished tobacco fees which, in sterling value, were equal to or
above those of 1719, and it greatly eased the problem of collection.
Only the money provision troubled office holders. The face value
of £0. 12. 6 currency was £0. 9. 4 1/2 sterling; but it circulated at
about £ 0. 6. 3, while tobacco now rose to twelve or sixteen shillings
sterling per hundred pounds. So on fees paid in currency officers
could lose as much as fifty percent. 16
Subsequent inspection and fee acts were passed in 1753 and
1763. The former struck off certain fractions, for greater ease in
16Officers complained too that debtors swore they produced no tobacco, or had
others swear for them, when actually they were planters. Cf. John Beale Bordley
to Roger Boyce, July 13, 1761 (Fee Book of J. B. Bordley, 1759-61, Bordley
Papers, Md. Historical Society).